The very accomplished L.A. City Attorney who has successfully asserted justice in Los Angeles and for Los Angeles on many occasions has more work defending Los Angeles and Angelenos since January. The excess work originates from Washington.
The latest example: Attorney General Session’s New Charging And Sentencing Directive. By all appearances the new directive (you can read it for yourself here: http://docdro.id/sa9wc0g) urges Elected District Attorneys, Attorneys General and State Attorneys to ignore the reality of each individual case and pursue the harshest sentence allowed by law. Complying with this Directive – and its ineffective and archaic “Tough on Crime” approach – would not only overwhelm the prison system but inflict injustice on Angelenos. It would improve nothing and serve no one. It would do nothing to ensure our safety, prevent crime, lower recidivism rates or rehabilitate the perpetrators.
Over 30 Current and Former Elected District Attorneys, Attorneys General and State Attorneys Sign Open Letter Denouncing Federal Return to Past “Tough on Crime” Mandates
Current and former elected state and local prosecutive leaders from around the nation have signed an open letter expressing “grave concerns” with the recent directive by Attorney General Jeff Sessions requiring federal prosecutors nationwide to charge, pursue, and seek the longest possible sentences, for the “most serious, readily provable offense.” These elected local prosecutors caution that the new AG directive marks an “unnecessary and unfortunate return to past ‘tough on crime’ practices that … don’t enhance or promote the safety of our communities.”
The bipartisan list of signers comes from several states, large cities, and smaller localities. These elected officials represent over 30 million Americans and hail from 17 states plus DC. This diverse and expansive group of elected leaders stressed their commitment to “prioritizing the safety, fair treatment and dignity of all members of our community” and to “undertake innovative approaches that promote public safety and fairness.”
“Our communities are safest when prosecutors assess each case on its merits, taking evidence-based steps to reduce the chance the defendant will offend again,” said Los Angeles City Attorney Mike Feuer. “The draconian mandates of the Trump Administration are a setback for our justice system.”
Miriam Krinsky, the Executive Director for Fair and Just Prosecution – a group that works with prosecutive leaders around the nation committed to new thinking – noted that this letter “reflects a trend among a new wave of prosecutors nationwide who are rejecting excessively punitive policies in favor of data-driven and sensible approaches to improve public safety.” Krinsky, who also spent 15 years as a federal prosecutor, added: “The past few decades have amply demonstrated that harsh sentences – especially for low level drug offenders – do not deter crime and instead disproportionately impact people of color and fill our jails with individuals struggling with mental illness, drug addiction or poverty. We need prosecutors such as these who are willing to stand strong in the face of political winds intent on reviving the failed one-size-fits-all ‘tough on crime’ mindset of the 1980s.”
In addition to Feuer other signatories to the letter include District Attorneys Cy Vance (Manhattan), Kim Ogg (Houston), Mark Dupree (Kansas City), George Gascon (San Francisco), Sherry Boston (Atlanta), and Beth McCann (Denver), former DA Gil Garcetti (Los Angeles) as well as Attorneys General Karl Racine (Washington, D.C.), Ellen Rosenblum (Oregon) and TJ Donovan (Vermont).
Justice is supposed to be blind to remain objective and fair to each individual. Attorney General Session’s New Charging And Sentencing Directive lifts the blind of Lady Justice eyes: it would effectively remove mitigating circumstances and force prosecutors and judges to practice injustice regardless of its impact on individuals, constituents and ultimately, our City and Country.